The estate of late pop icon Michael Jackson has publicly criticized rapper Sexyy Red following the circulation of her controversial remix titled “Just Eat It,” a reworked version of the classic hit “Beat It.” The situation has sparked major conversation online, especially among fans of both artists, after the estate confirmed that the track was created and shared without official approval.

Reports emerging this week indicate that the remix gained attention after snippets began trending across social media platforms. The estate quickly responded with a firm statement, saying they were completely unaware of the project and describing the use of the original music as unauthorized. The response has intensified debates about sampling rights, artistic freedom, and how legacy artists’ catalogs are protected in the streaming era.

According to entertainment reports, representatives for Michael Jackson’s estate expressed disappointment over the remix, emphasizing their commitment to protecting the integrity of the singer’s musical legacy. The team made it clear that permission was never granted for the adaptation of “Beat It,” one of the most recognizable songs in Jackson’s catalog.

“We were totally unaware of this. The use of the music is unauthorized,” the estate said in a brief but direct statement that quickly went viral online.

Fans of the late singer flooded social media with mixed reactions. Some praised the estate for taking a strong stance in defending Jackson’s work, while others argued that modern artists often remix classic songs as a form of tribute or creative experimentation. The controversy highlights the ongoing tension between nostalgia-driven music culture and strict intellectual property rules in the digital age.

Entertainment analysts note that unauthorized remixes frequently surface online before being cleared legally, especially when artists test audience reactions through leaks or live previews. However, estates managing iconic catalogs tend to act swiftly when material is released without licensing agreements in place.

The backlash has also drawn attention to broader conversations about how classic music is reused by newer artists. Some listeners felt the remix crossed a line due to its explicit themes, while others viewed it as part of hip hop’s long tradition of flipping familiar records into modern sounds.

Clips circulating online show fans debating whether the remix will ever receive an official release or be removed entirely. Industry insiders suggest that legal action could follow if the song is distributed commercially without authorization.

Neither Sexyy Red nor her management team has issued a detailed public response addressing the estate’s claims as of the time of writing. The rapper has built a reputation for bold and provocative releases, which often generate strong reactions from both supporters and critics. Still, situations involving major estates typically require formal clearance processes before any remix or sample can move forward.

As discussions continue, the incident has once again placed Michael Jackson’s music catalog in the spotlight, reminding fans of the lasting influence of his work decades after its original release. Whether the remix fades away quietly or evolves into a larger legal dispute remains uncertain, but the conversation around creative boundaries in modern music shows no sign of slowing down.